Peer Review Policy
The International Journal of Green Agriculture and Agrotechnical Sciences follows a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific integrity of all published research.
Review Model
The journal adopts a double-blind peer review system, where:
- The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential
- Manuscripts are evaluated impartially without bias
Review Process
- Initial Screening
Manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial team for scope, formatting, and plagiarism. - Reviewer Assignment
Suitable manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. - Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:- Originality and novelty
- Scientific validity and methodology
- Relevance to the journal scope
- Clarity and quality of presentation
- Reviewer Recommendations
Reviewers may recommend:- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
- Editorial Decision
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewer feedback.
Review Timeline
- The review process typically takes 2–4 weeks
- Authors are notified promptly regarding the status of their manuscript
Revision and Resubmission
- Authors must address all reviewer comments carefully
- Revised manuscripts should be submitted within the specified timeframe
- Additional rounds of review may be conducted if required
Confidentiality
- All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents
- Reviewers must not share or use any unpublished information
Conflict of Interest
- Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest
- Manuscripts with potential conflicts will be reassigned to ensure fairness