Editorial Policy

The International Journal of Green Agriculture and Agrotechnical Sciences follows a transparent, fair, and rigorous editorial process to ensure the publication of high-quality scholarly research in the field of green agriculture and agrotechnical sciences.

Editorial Principles

  • Manuscripts are evaluated based on originality, relevance, scientific quality, and clarity
  • Editorial decisions are made without bias regarding authors’ nationality, institutional affiliation, or background
  • All submissions are handled with strict confidentiality

Initial Screening

  • All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team
  • Manuscripts are checked for:
    • Scope relevance
    • Formatting compliance
    • Plagiarism (similarity index)
  • Manuscripts that do not meet the journal requirements may be rejected at this stage

Peer Review Process

  • The journal follows a double-blind peer review system
  • Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts
  • Reviewers evaluate:
    • Scientific validity
    • Methodology
    • Significance of results
    • Clarity of presentation

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editorial team will make one of the following decisions:

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

Authors will be notified of the decision along with reviewer comments.

Revision Process

  • Authors are required to submit revised manuscripts within the specified timeframe
  • All revisions must address reviewer comments clearly
  • Revised manuscripts may be sent for re-evaluation

Final Decision & Publication

  • The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief
  • Accepted manuscripts are prepared for publication and published online
  • The journal ensures timely publication while maintaining quality standards